Add changes for researchreport pages

[RitwikSrivastava]

Please always provide the GitHub issue(s) your PR is for, as well as test URLs where your change can be observed (before and after):

Fixes #

Test URLs:

• Original: https://www.sunstar-foundation.org/grants/research-report

• Before: https://main--sunstar-foundation--hlxsites.hlx.live/grants/research-report

• After: https://pdfcolumn--sunstar-foundation--hlxsites.hlx.live/grants/research-report

• [ ] New Blocks introduced in this PR If yes, please provide details below

Block Name	Documentation
For e.g. cards	doc-link

• [ ] New variations introduced in this PR

Variation Name	Documentation
For e.g. cards (grid)	doc-link

[aem-code-sync[bot]]

Hello, I'm the AEM Code Sync Bot and I will run some actions to deploy your branch and validate page speed. In case there are problems, just click a checkbox below to rerun the respective action.

• [ ] Re-run PSI checks
• [ ] Re-sync branch

Commits

* [8b548a8](https://github.com/hlxsites/sunstar-foundation/pull/111/commits/8b548a8b570029b083d44228ffa87e7644b5b19e) :white_check_mark: (latest) * [483adaf](https://github.com/hlxsites/sunstar-foundation/pull/111/commits/483adaf41639940546bab466253e6c9a318f913c) :white_check_mark: * [ff6dabd](https://github.com/hlxsites/sunstar-foundation/pull/111/commits/ff6dabd2eb6c54262a8f73b4d12107afcd79be86) :white_check_mark: * [490b905](https://github.com/hlxsites/sunstar-foundation/pull/111/commits/490b905fac8d3779d2316bee2f9183bb5b7da297) :white_check_mark: * [bba05de](https://github.com/hlxsites/sunstar-foundation/pull/111/commits/bba05deb85a042757bdc4100d6f909cd944c8011) :white_check_mark: * [2f38f37](https://github.com/hlxsites/sunstar-foundation/pull/111/commits/2f38f37444c0bf34c68641bfc8b51b845f172dbc) :white_check_mark: * [afc6e11](https://github.com/hlxsites/sunstar-foundation/pull/111/commits/afc6e110770e4dbcc5624df21c7b07f02e47d504) :white_check_mark: * [0794549](https://github.com/hlxsites/sunstar-foundation/pull/111/commits/0794549576f823bd50828c1412996abec5e5a165) :white_check_mark:

[aem-code-sync[bot]]

Page	Scores	Audits	Google
/grants/research-report

[bosschaert]

The table still looks quite different on the test URL page:

Original:

This branch:

[JiangLong2019]

In mobile view, there are some details things like padding and space that need to be checked.

Original site:

EDS site:

[RitwikSrivastava]

@bosschaert Can you please re-review ?

[bosschaert]

@RitwikSrivastava could you please confirm that the reported visual changes are no issue?

[github-actions[bot]]

:small_orange_diamond: 9 visual differences detected

• /en/awards/awards-photo-gallery/1107 (main vs branch)
  Expected an image 1280px by 2485px, received 1280px by 2433px. 387507 pixels (ratio 0.13 of all image pixels) are different.
• /sidekick/blocks/collage (main vs branch)
  Expected an image 1280px by 8688px, received 1280px by 8741px.
• /sidekick/blocks/cards (main vs branch)
  Expected an image 1280px by 3385px, received 1280px by 2953px. 918249 pixels (ratio 0.22 of all image pixels) are different.
• /sidekick/blocks/columns (main vs branch)
  Expected an image 1280px by 14433px, received 1280px by 14466px.
• /sidekick/blocks/tables (main vs branch)
  276836 pixels (ratio 0.05 of all image pixels) are different.
• /sidekick/blocks/sections (main vs branch)
  Expected an image 1280px by 11839px, received 1280px by 11679px. 653319 pixels (ratio 0.05 of all image pixels) are different.
• /sidekick/blocks/feed (main vs branch)
  Expected an image 1280px by 1233px, received 1280px by 1017px. 32849 pixels (ratio 0.03 of all image pixels) are different.
• /sidekick/blocks/hero-banner (main vs branch)
  Expected an image 1280px by 5701px, received 1280px by 5605px. 1079005 pixels (ratio 0.15 of all image pixels) are different.
• /sidekick/blocks/text (main vs branch)
  Expected an image 1280px by 1709px, received 1280px by 1825px. 33178 pixels (ratio 0.02 of all image pixels) are different.

The diff images are attached in the artifact

[RitwikSrivastava]

@bosschaert As all the style changes are for orderedtext variant, I can confirm that the reported visual changes are not an issue. I have checked those also.