hmrc / HMRC-content-style-guide

Apache License 2.0
1 stars 2 forks source link

Taxed Award Scheme #86

Closed jennifer-hodgson closed 5 years ago

jennifer-hodgson commented 6 years ago

Use this issue to discuss Taxed Award Scheme in the HMRC content style guide.

philjhogg commented 6 years ago

This is covered by the GOV.UK style guide at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/style-guide/a-to-z-of-gov-uk-style#c > Capitalisation > names of specific, named government schemes known to people outside government. So can probably be removed from the HMRC content style guide.

jennifer-hodgson commented 6 years ago

There are a number of entries for different schemes:

Should we remove all of them, given that this advice already exists, or retain those that have extra guidance about hyphenation, ie those except:

If we do this, will this decision be obvious to users, or will they be confused by not seeing individual entries for these?

philjhogg commented 6 years ago

If we covered all these in a single "Schemes" entry and put some context around that these have some specific rules (and that otherwise you follow the GOV.UK style) - would that help?

jennifer-hodgson commented 6 years ago

I will draft something. Thanks.

jennifer-hodgson commented 6 years ago

How is this?

schemes

Follow the GOV.UK style guide on capitalising specific, named government schemes known to people outside government.

Some government schemes are styled in a specific way:

stevenaproctor commented 6 years ago

That is great. I would put a 'for example' at the end of the lead-in.

jennifer-hodgson commented 6 years ago

I considered this, but they're not, strictly speaking, "examples" (meaning: this is a small sample and there are others too). Rather, it is my understanding that these are intended as a more-or-less exhaustive list of all the schemes that are styled differently. Is that correct?

stevenaproctor commented 6 years ago

OK. Maybe...

Some HMRC schemes are styled in a specific way. These are:

jennifer-hodgson commented 6 years ago

I'm being a stickler because these being examples may create ambiguity :)

I'll add "These are:"

stevenaproctor commented 5 years ago

Replaced by #96.