Closed jennifer-hodgson closed 5 years ago
This is covered by the GOV.UK style guide at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/style-guide/a-to-z-of-gov-uk-style#c > Capitalisation > names of specific, named government schemes known to people outside government. So can probably be removed from the HMRC content style guide.
There are a number of entries for different schemes:
Should we remove all of them, given that this advice already exists, or retain those that have extra guidance about hyphenation, ie those except:
If we do this, will this decision be obvious to users, or will they be confused by not seeing individual entries for these?
If we covered all these in a single "Schemes" entry and put some context around that these have some specific rules (and that otherwise you follow the GOV.UK style) - would that help?
I will draft something. Thanks.
How is this?
schemes
Follow the GOV.UK style guide on capitalising specific, named government schemes known to people outside government.
Some government schemes are styled in a specific way:
That is great. I would put a 'for example' at the end of the lead-in.
I considered this, but they're not, strictly speaking, "examples" (meaning: this is a small sample and there are others too). Rather, it is my understanding that these are intended as a more-or-less exhaustive list of all the schemes that are styled differently. Is that correct?
OK. Maybe...
Some HMRC schemes are styled in a specific way. These are:
I'm being a stickler because these being examples may create ambiguity :)
I'll add "These are:"
Replaced by #96.
Use this issue to discuss Taxed Award Scheme in the HMRC content style guide.