reserved identifier violation

[elfring]

I would like to point out that an identifier like “_ACO_H” does eventually not fit to the expected naming convention of the C language standard. Would you like to adjust your selection for unique names?

[hnes]

Thank you very much, Markus, @elfring.

It is very kind of you to point out this mistake. I'll fix that immediately.

[hnes]

This fix absolutely deserves the new patch release v1.2.1 .

[hnes]

The release of v1.2.1 had already fixed such noncompliant definition of the macro name problem.

Thanks Markus for your report :D

[elfring]

Thanks for your small source code improvement.

I suggest to reconsider also an identifier like “aco_s__”.

[hnes]

And also, the "__xmm*" identifiers have the same problem too. Thanks Markus :D

I'll fix them as soon as possible.

[elfring]

Will these source code adjustments have got any influence on the definition for an identifier like “ACO_VERSION_PATCH”?

[hnes]

Yep... Bingo! Thank you very much, Markus.

[hnes]

Solved in the release of v1.2.2.