Alright found out a funny interaction with ControlNet and Pose.
It's related to folder named and load order between these two.
What's happening?
I have both my extension folders named, Control-Net and Posex respectively.
• So what happening?
I was always having an issue related to Control-Net saying it was active but no image was used.
After a couple trial and errors, switching back and forth between Posex commits, I decided to a quick test.
Namely making pose "load" before control net by renaming their folders to 00-Posex and 01-Control-net.
For my surprise it worked, no longer those errors.
Commit where this happens:
233daf8e1460c90d24a0f8c21bc5ec712ee258df
And prior.
Additional Notes:
Could we have a retro-compatibility for gradio 3.16 ?
After most recent Posex updates starting from commit a1cdda Posex stopped working with gradio 3.16.
It shows up in WEBUI, but it doesn't launch when clicked in [ ] send to controlnet.
Automatic1111 was having too much issues, so I switched anapnoe fork.
Overview
Alright found out a funny interaction with ControlNet and Pose. It's related to folder named and load order between these two.
What's happening?
I have both my extension folders named,
Control-NetandPosexrespectively. • So what happening? I was always having an issue related toControl-Net saying it was active but no image was used.After a couple trial and errors, switching back and forth between Posex commits, I decided to a quick test. Namely making pose "load" before control net by renaming their folders to 00-Posex and 01-Control-net. For my surprise it worked, no longer those errors.Commit where this happens:
And prior.
Additional Notes:
Could we have a retro-compatibility for gradio 3.16 ? After most recent Posex updates starting from commit
a1cddaPosex stopped working with gradio 3.16. It shows up in WEBUI, but it doesn't launch when clicked in[ ] send to controlnet.Automatic1111 was having too much issues, so I switched anapnoe fork.
• Thanks for your amazing work •