search

hoangduit / openmeetings

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/openmeetings
0 stars 0 forks source link

Error in screenviewer #538

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I got today the latest svn code, but the screenviewer won't start with the 
error reported below.
The error seems around the args passed to the main method: any hints 
about ?
Where i'm wrong ?

java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 4
    at org.openmeetings.webstart.gui.StartScreen.main(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.executeApplication(Unknown Source)
    at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.executeMainClass(Unknown Source)
    at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.doLaunchApp(Unknown Source)
    at com.sun.javaws.Launcher.run(Unknown Source)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

Thanks.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by rabell...@di.unito.it on 4 Oct 2008 at 12:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
are you sure you did a complete update? Meaning the folder *screen* and 
*WEB-INF*
both updated? 

I just did test with latest code, had no Exceptions.

Original comment by seba.wag...@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2008 at 7:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
After a while I found that openmeetings-templates is not rebuilt if you not 
remove 
the bin directory. I did an update to the source code from svn but the 
templates 
under bin are never updated by ant build if changed.
Removing bin directory solved my problem.

Thanks.

Original comment by rabell...@di.unito.it on 4 Oct 2008 at 9:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
running *ant clean* should delete the content of *bin* folder.

Original comment by seba.wag...@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2008 at 10:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
I do not know in deep ant, but cannot be declared a dependancy on the "change 
timestamp" of a file, which is the usual semantic in 'make'?
(question just for fun... not really a problem)

Original comment by rabell...@di.unito.it on 4 Oct 2008 at 12:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
hmm no, I don't think so, its a usual approach to run *ant clean* and then *ant
build/dist/compile* to re-compile the hole thing again.

Original comment by seba.wag...@gmail.com on 4 Oct 2008 at 12:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Thanks for clarifying me about ant semantics.

Original comment by rabell...@di.unito.it on 4 Oct 2008 at 12:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by seba.wag...@gmail.com on 29 Aug 2011 at 8:02