Open b-viguier opened 4 years ago
ℹ️ My current workaround is to suffix my keywords with something like this:
%token bool (true|false)(?![a-zA-Z_0-9])
To prevent falsely
to be detected as the keyword false
followed by ly
(should match an other pattern for "identifier" tokens)… but seems a little tricky, isn't it?
Hi! This library looks really awesome, so I'm playing with it but I'm facing with a "basic" issue and I can't figure out if it's a limitation, a bug, or my mistake… Can you help me?
Here a minimalist grammar to illustrate my situation:
I want to match all words, but
a
is a special keyword, I want to match it distinctly. The problem comes when I try to parse"ab"
:a
is recognized as a token and then the parser is stuck onb
character with anUnexpectedToken
exception. In my understanding, the parser should backtrack, discard the choice of the tokena
and follow with the tokenword
… Am I wrong?ℹ️
"a"
input is identified as aword
👎%token word a\w+|[^a]\w*
at first rule but… looks very weird and hard to maintain IMHOa
, matching words only and use AST to identify my specific keywords, but I think it's the role of the syntax analyzer, isn't it?Thanks in advance for your help, and your nice work on this library :) 👍