Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
D,
If you read the release notes:
http://code.google.com/p/rfortran/wiki/VersionHistory#v2.0.0_-_19_Feb_2010
You will note that the CVF version has yet to be updated for this v2.0.0
release.
(mostly because my installation of CVF is currently inoperable requires
re-installing)
You are most welcome to update the CVF files yourself.
Otherwise, this is planned to be updated in next minor release (v2.1) of
RFortran.
Michael, are you able to update CVF at all?
Cheers,
Mark
Original comment by mark.th...@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2010 at 11:21
CVF patch attached that appears to resolve CVF issues encountered thus far.
Includes both updates to the CVF project and also the buggy 'vartyp' handling.
May I ask Mark as Developer-In-Chief to check the changes (using IVF, as the
RGet_Rput file has changed) and update both the offical and trunk versions of
RFortran.
d
Original comment by dmitri.k...@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2010 at 1:13
Attachments:
D,
My CVF installation has somehow been corrupted on both my laptop and my desktop
and I can no longer "add files". This means I can only do very limited testing
of the CVF version. Do you know how I can
un-install CVF- I could not find it in "add/remove programs"?
I've included most of your patches and also made some other changes to enable
compilation with CVF. These have been committed to the release branch:
svn/branches/ver-2.0 .
Would you mind updating and checking everything is working ok with your CVF
before I create a new installer.
One question - why the need to change the declaration of the variable, vartyp?
Your patch changed it in some sections and not others. I would like to
understand before I implement these changes in the
entire code. The renaming of variables when used from a module is a F90
feature. At my end, both CVF and IVF compile using the existing version. What
bug did this create?
Once these minor issues are resolved I will create a new installer.
Mark
You patch only changed it
Original comment by mark.th...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2010 at 1:38
in the patched locations, you were accessing the same entity - which is
incidentally,
a parameter (eg, VT_R8) in 2 ways: once via its original name and another thru
the
renaming facility. this was triggering an error in my CVF 6.6.B (from memory, an
attempt to reference the same entity via different names). I also dont believe
that
is allowed by the standard.
also I think the patch makes it clearer what is going on - it actually took me a
while to figure out what you were doing in the original code..
i have no problem checking the CVF version of RFortran.
Original comment by dmitri.k...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2010 at 5:12
I've updated the handling of vartyp, its available from the release version:
svn/branches/ver-2.0
If could please check this in CVF and then I can close this ticket
Mark
Original comment by mark.th...@gmail.com
on 10 Apr 2010 at 12:35
Original comment by mark.th...@gmail.com
on 11 Apr 2010 at 2:03
Original comment by mark.th...@gmail.com
on 16 Apr 2010 at 6:07
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dmitri.k...@gmail.com
on 10 Mar 2010 at 10:07