Closed tylerdanke closed 6 years ago
It's not actually used in the constitution...
5.0 actually does now. Even if it didn't, i would like to pitch that it is not well enough explained.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 9:04 AM brianjrobertson notifications@github.com wrote:
Closed #241 https://github.com/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/241.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/holacracyone/Holacracy-Constitution/issues/241#event-1578759767, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHENvJ4GJw00EF9NRlz1foQoKJNCt3aHks5tpeh5gaJpZM4TXScq .
Ah, good point, it is used. Please feel free to re-open a new issue with either a specific suggestion to improve it, or a more specific argument on why the current text (and the sentence after harm is used) leaves too much ambiguity (ideally with a real example of when the lack of clarity got in the way).
harm is not defined.