Closed holgerteichgraeber closed 5 years ago
:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
documentation@d483c9e
). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage is50%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## documentation #97 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 64.46%
================================================
Files ? 9
Lines ? 515
Branches ? 0
================================================
Hits ? 332
Misses ? 183
Partials ? 0
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
src/clustering/run_clust.jl | 88.54% <100%> (ø) |
|
src/utils/load_data.jl | 71.42% <16.66%> (ø) |
|
src/clustering/extreme_vals.jl | 84.21% <33.33%> (ø) |
|
src/utils/utils.jl | 83.15% <50%> (ø) |
|
src/utils/datastructs.jl | 97.36% <75%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d483c9e...200edfc. Read the comment docs.
Codecov Report
❗️ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (
documentation@d483c9e
). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage is50%
.@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## documentation #97 +/- ## ================================================ Coverage ? 64.46% ================================================ Files ? 9 Lines ? 515 Branches ? 0 ================================================ Hits ? 332 Misses ? 183 Partials ? 0
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/clustering/run_clust.jl88.54% <100%> (ø)
src/utils/load_data.jl71.42% <16.66%> (ø)
src/clustering/extreme_vals.jl84.21% <33.33%> (ø)
src/utils/utils.jl83.15% <50%> (ø)
src/utils/datastructs.jl97.36% <75%> (ø)
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d483c9e...c53c37c. Read the comment docs.
This happened because the documentation
branch does not have coverage, that's to be expected..
Great testing overall! I added a few questions and suggestions to the code. What would you think about a few comments explaining the main process that you use for testing?
Thanks. The comments for testing mostly in test/run_clust.jl
or where would you think they are most appropriate?
Added some minor updates on testing and documentation. Already pushed to dev.
Great testing overall! I added a few questions and suggestions to the code. What would you think about a few comments explaining the main process that you use for testing?
Thanks. The comments for testing mostly in
test/run_clust.jl
or where would you think they are most appropriate?
I thought about an explanation in test/runtests.jl
In case someone else wants to expand the package with their own method and needs to know, how testing works in general.
Great testing overall! I added a few questions and suggestions to the code. What would you think about a few comments explaining the main process that you use for testing?
Thanks. The comments for testing mostly in
test/run_clust.jl
or where would you think they are most appropriate?I thought about an explanation in
test/runtests.jl
In case someone else wants to expand the package with their own method and needs to know, how testing works in general.
Sounds good. Opening an issue to be addressed after name change. #112
Thank you for your comments on this @YoungFaithful . Because this PR was previously merged #98 , closing it here.
@error
byerror(msg)
. The former is used for logging, whereas the later throws an Exception. We want the latter.The branch
testing
is based offdocumentation
. Before evaluating this PR, please first review #96 .In #91, there are several TODOs concerning which functions still need test coverage. Let's implement them after this PR.