Now that elements can be added as input to annotators, I would expect that each element could have its own projection. For example, I have a reservoir_df that is in UTM and a dam_df data frame that is in Plate Carree. I could feed these as data frames directly into the annotator, but to define the distinct projections, I converted them to gv objects each with their own projection. However, when I feed these into PolyAndPointAnnotator it doesn't honor them. If I give the annotator a crs, I think it overrules everything. If I don't give a crs and just give the gv objects (one as polys and one as points) it takes the first one and assumes the second is the same. Shouldn't it just honor the projection of the element?
kcpevey
commented
5 years ago
Now that elements can be added as input to annotators, I would expect that each element could have its own projection. For example, I have a
reservoir_dfthat is in UTM and adam_dfdata frame that is in Plate Carree. I could feed these as data frames directly into the annotator, but to define the distinct projections, I converted them to gv objects each with their own projection. However, when I feed these intoPolyAndPointAnnotatorit doesn't honor them. If I give the annotator a crs, I think it overrules everything. If I don't give a crs and just give the gv objects (one as polys and one as points) it takes the first one and assumes the second is the same. Shouldn't it just honor the projection of the element?