Closed spiglerg closed 10 years ago
I'll fix this and it will be mergeable later this afternoon (on my next commit). :)
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:01 PM, J.L Stevens notifications@github.com wrote:
The code is a big improvement over the last PR for this. Once you confirm that you can reset the various channel data lists using a new empty list (instead of emptying in place), I think this can be merged.
There are a few minor issues that I am happy to deal this (e.g. stray commented code) once merged.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ioam/imagen/pull/36#issuecomment-50962253.
Your reply to Jim is now hidden - it is attached to the wrong line on an outdated diff. I'll reproduce it here for you:
Because self() from Selector already generates new data from current_generator, and channels() repeats the exact same operation. It's a waste of computing time.
In the future we could add support for use_cached in Selector too: however it has to be designed carefully, as no generator might be selected and this could lead to crashes.
If you want, I am happy to apply your diff directly to master once this is decided (and credit you appropriately). Your commit messages are completely useless and I see no good reason for them to appear in the commit history.
Oh right, thank you very much ! :)
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 4:54 PM, J.L Stevens notifications@github.com wrote:
Your reply to Jim is now hidden - it is attached to the wrong line on an outdated diff. I'll reproduce it here for you:
Because self() from Selector already generates new data from current_generator, and channels() repeats the exact same operation. It's a waste of computing time.
In the future we could add support for use_cached in Selector too: however it has to be designed carefully, as no generator might be selected and this could lead to crashes.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ioam/imagen/pull/36#issuecomment-50966363.
Ok, based on Giacomo's explanation, the code for Selector.channels seems fine, though it needs a comment explaining this fairly convoluted reasoning. So, Jean-Luc, you can apply these changes and then close this PR if you like, or just merge it and take the hit on those three not-very-informative commit messages if you want to be lazy like I would be. Thanks!
Just added a quick explanation in the docstring!
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 9:34 PM, James A. Bednar notifications@github.com wrote:
Ok, based on Giacomo's explanation, the code for Selector.channels seems fine, though it needs a comment explaining this fairly convoluted reasoning. So, Jean-Luc, you can apply these changes and then close this PR if you like, or just merge it and take the hit on those three not-very-informative commit messages if you want to be lazy like I would be. Thanks!
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/ioam/imagen/pull/36#issuecomment-50973578.
Applied these fixes in ceaa5e7. Thanks!
The code is a big improvement over the last PR to fix this issues.
Once you confirm that you can reset the various channel data lists using a new empty list (instead of emptying in place), I think this can be merged.
There are a few minor issues that I am happy to deal this (e.g. stray commented code) once merged.