search

home-assistant / home-assistant.io

:blue_book: Home Assistant User documentation
https://www.home-assistant.io
Other
4.88k stars 7.25k forks source link

Website installations "used by ... active installations" analytics inaccurate? #35201

Open ARW-online opened 1 week ago

ARW-online commented 1 week ago

Feedback

The https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/eafm/ page states that it is used by 0 (zero) active installations -- but I am using it, I have been for a couple of months now, and I have all analytics enabled on my installation.

The UK Environment Agency Flood Monitoring integration was introduced in Home Assistant 0.115, and it's used by [0](https://analytics.home-assistant.io/integrations) active installations.

Is there something amiss with my reporting, or is there an issue in analytics?

URL

https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/eafm/

Version

2024.10.2

Additional information

No response

j4n-e4t commented 1 week ago

Hi @ARW-online! Generally said, the analytics for Home Assistant are opt in which means that these numbers don't track the entire ecosystem. However, 0 installs seems a bit suspicious to me I and can look into that if you want to. Weirdly, the integration also doesn't come up here https://analytics.home-assistant.io/integrations/

ARW-online commented 1 week ago

Thanks! Yes please. It's not that important to me, per-se, but in general I would not like integrations to be undervalued due to inconsistent stats. I realise not everyone would opt-in... But I am opted in, so would expect the counter to say at least 1 active user!

j4n-e4t commented 5 days ago

Hi @ARW-online,

sadly, I wasn't able to figure out, what's the exact issue with the eafm integration. However, I've seen other integrations with "0" users. Could be a bigger issue then but I could be wrong...