Closed gr2m closed 8 years ago
Sounds good to me, it make sense even if it's not a 1:1.
Makes sense to keep it in sync with the current documentation, especially since "bundle" sounds a lot more related to Browserify than Hoodie. 1:1 FTW. :+1:
We talk about about "Hoodie client" and it will be mentioned a lot in the documentation, also the main repository is hoodie-client. So it would be more consistent to have the route where the Hoodie client is served /hoodie/client.js.
+1
Note that /hoodie/client.js is not serving hoodie-client 1:1. hoodie-client returns a Hoodie constructor, /hoodie/client.js returns an instance of Hoodie with options passed in.
Currently it is the pre-built hoodie-client though.
it’s decided then, let’s do it: https://github.com/hoodiehq/hoodie-server/issues/459
We talk about about "Hoodie client" and it will be mentioned a lot in the documentation, also the main repository is
hoodie-client
. So it would be more consistent to have the route where the Hoodie client is served/hoodie/client.js
.Note that
/hoodie/client.js
is not servinghoodie-client
1:1.hoodie-client
returns a Hoodie constructor,/hoodie/client.js
returns an instance of Hoodie with options passed in.Any thoughts?
@boennemann @christophwitzko @janl