Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
I'm part of a development team that's evaluating Wizardby and we're thinking of
implementing this feature ourselves but I would like to get a feel for how much
effort you think would be involved in adding support. I was just about to look
through the code but considering you know the foundation and are generally
responsive I thought I would ask. Would you consider this implementation
difficult or just low priority?
Original comment by grig...@gmail.com
on 29 Jul 2010 at 3:53
I can't say it's very difficult - it's just I myself never needed this
functionality, so it's a low-priority issue. Agreed, this is a nice to have
feature, so I'll bump up the priority and try to do something cohesive over the
weekend.
Original comment by anton.go...@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2010 at 8:04
Thanks very much for taking a look at this, I appreciate it!
Original comment by grig...@gmail.com
on 30 Jul 2010 at 1:15
Original comment by anton.go...@gmail.com
on 3 Aug 2010 at 6:01
[deleted comment]
This issue was updated by revision r164.
Added support for composite PKs in "add table" situations.
Original comment by anton.go...@gmail.com
on 3 Aug 2010 at 6:50
You're amazing, thanks for the work you've put into this issue.
Original comment by grig...@gmail.com
on 3 Aug 2010 at 2:35
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
anton.go...@gmail.com
on 23 Mar 2009 at 3:36