shanefontaine
commented
2 years ago @gitnickv
Thank you for the submission. Unfortunately, this submission does not meet one of the criteria for submissions:
Methodology that has a non-negligible chance of eliminating legitimate users will not be considered
There will need to be additional proof submitted in order to consider this a valid group that does not include any legitimate users. Please consider providing more information about the behavior of these addresses, such as identical types of transactions or similar timing of transactions. Please note that another user that submits an issue with a detailed, non-negligible chance of eliminating legitimate users, their submission will be considered before yours.
It looks like only 32 of the addresses you submitted are eligible, and 31 of those exist in the "bit tougher to recognize". Please consider posting some of the following data for all of those addresses, if possible:
- Identical transactions on the exact same day/time by most or all of the addresses
- A trace of the ERC20 token between addresses (as opposed to native tokens)
- A similar time/date that all the addresses started transacting on a chain
Related Addresses
\x440b4a49248f25a9cf514ad8c1557cbf504ed5c4 \x06cc94293290b0ca235e8deab74d5fad7e6b8ce4 \x0fe88914b8caa4698c876e6ea40d405f68673534 \x1de39ff38945d3b37134cd783b7be3452779e1e0 \x21fcf7d45a0c636f62b8c16f98677bee5421cce9 \x25406e420b420cfc1d99940e7cd297b5740adfb9 \x3956e5160dfe0af59986ce4babeeff681fb53168 \x4dfa463069f490228e61d43690ad152662a66340 \x971506c632dfb1dc6e7a2d064f7d571569462f4b \x973b3e5130ae4f18f78bad053a3155e6b8034f43 \x9df72a7d52a60975444ca86d89755e335f7eed65 \xa2445ea0e997e9ecc714250718d600c294a188ea \xaa8304cce6b057af952938d0232f0477d05decb5 \xb029800f0b4c4e9a3514535ba487c7bb4ab6831a \xc5745e19401b3ecf016a6b3bd6553852547c41af \xc8131bc8075afb3e30162bb8ed2f9521f665f7be \xc99ac7e4ae5256f55a5fa911077e4a9b0a0f183a \xe1d9d246c607936c4ed2153cf9762bca82d900b0 \xeaebdb2c71ea29844919ff532f508030231fd48d \xef0a05f41cada3fa2110c50ad66c74a9242a119c \xe4706d646e97c8a36109ea81b13eb834f5b3bed1 \xad0dbd2735b2bdef14334f622147526bd97b2f4f \xe830a79facbcd2c89de0b5e5c5a67a7190ec53a1 \x7cd9ef2fd657a042bf7815d02f487a7ab40f30b0 \x3e40a3c03f0f3cd652428292df4c12625c18a59d \x4bdc264560136b1c4556fdb4f7a90376169b91d1 \x982e09ebd5bf6f4f9cce5d0c84514fb96d91c5f9 \x6b611d278233cb7ca76fd5c08579c3337c01e577 \x37d27c00ff4d9b7f5dddf877cc14e7f919a6490d \x7b17df087859f731a2097fe040a1af3b70df3c95 \x5fd2c02689d138547b7b1b9e7d9a309d5a03edcd \x299c06e5379924884f8d5cc9112e6c338178f884 \xe3f27deff96fe178e87559f36cbf868b9e75967d \x5bef93a613d78b3ff56c2439d3ae58a26b3353c1 \x6e2fc50bdde3e8b45ab47282986c5c45ffb08b7e \xbcbe9b878543b9d4098497c67f1e95bc44a0b34c \x55a9c5180dcafc98d99d3f3e4b248e9156b12ac1 \x85844112d2f9cfe2254188b4ee69edd942fad32d \x6f9c8dcf20cd691a1f1944d28b3f63131f67ccb1 \xd52c1d745c16d52904b32baf4a08b3356a5136a5 \x2b333ae41632c0266ae275e811bb5eeb3f21fd03 \x535a8757d22668ad76d3a3e73ba3d5f411174709 \x46bae1972c869527c8b8fa5b92fb747d7d51fd42 \x9d1b972e7cee2317e24719de943b2da0b9435454 \xaed07b5d8e841f792e1de379b53af2fb2132839d \x34b5f399cc5a1dd491666c9866941fb8e8d09746 \x38a48ddf98d3d6af7fd46a692265d72515534525 \x7492e719607e2b31c878c9bb30a575fc75d0d518 \x1008e41106813a1cc6b5f9c378e2cf1c47158e7d \x18dff00a8b2894ddbd7e0d74a5057fe2e76c250d \x036d78c5e87e0aa07bf61815d1effe10c9fd5275 \x32514465a9e274973436bc58549b581be49b5641 \x11fab9134c4169377b297bc2c0c82891bbbe3d34 \x303c36e5c473bf36bf643debeb61c68f780641aa \x8096da6ced12b75684054ef16e1bf7e376353c29 \x47c2ac06520722aaa3e32d99ec6a2352b48b1b8a \xf490f58567fabfc2aee47ffa3a87be29590df3b3 \xc08eaaf1204ea5e7c71e900c67c41068a01476f4 \x07ee3deefffc9e8b94b5603dee0f76dd98db1c26 \x0d15e3c5747c678ad9b6d660d7d6a2dec19f0e76
Reasoning
All those addresses are related to 0x440b4a49248f25a9cf514ad8c1557cbf504ed5c4
Methodology
First 19 addresses was initially filled by 0x440b4a49248f25a9cf514ad8c1557cbf504ed5c4. And all of them made kind of the same transactions in a same date (funding Optimism, Arbitrum and ZKSync - trying to sybil attack them all).
Next 5 wallets was funded by 6 different wallets from a batch of 19 mentioned before. And they have same list of transactions as previous (and made in a same date).
Another 35 are a bit tougher to recognize. I made a strong analysis of transfers from and to those wallets made (based on their transfers to or from 19+5 addresses founded before). Here is a result of this analysis:
A complete list of transactions those wallets made between each other is in attachment
Rewards Address
0x72153F1040BDfe6961bB73448f1AF265B2bFDf0b sybil-report-nftaura.csv