Closed severinmenard closed 11 years ago
Before:
After:
Are there paved tracks??
Sorry?
I thnk he's asking whether there's would be ways that are tagged: highway=track AND surface=paved .
And the answer to that is, very likely, no. In the HDM contexts, highway=track is for roads at the edge of semi-rural (like small route, that would areas, as I understand. They are the types of roads that would often best driven on by 4x4s and are NOT national routes.
That means nobody would think about tagging highway=track and surface=unpaved, so for 99.9% of cases, we will get the rendering I linked
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Will Skora notifications@github.comwrote:
I thnk he's asking whether there's would be ways that are tagged: highway=track AND surface=paved .
And the answer to that is, very likely, no.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/hotosm/HDM-CartoCSS/issues/142#issuecomment-23217708 .
humm, I don't know what makes you say this, but no, the rendering will not be the one you have linked any more, nowhere, never (unless during the time the tiles have not been regenerated). And just to make it clear: setting surface=paved
on an highway=track
has no effect.
Aaaah, ok, I guess you have read and misunderstood the commit message! ;)
Use unpaved for track
This means "use the same color as unpaved roads for rendering track instead of a custom one which is not contrasted enough on top of residential areas". :)
Ahhhh yes I thought you told me we should use the surface=unpaved tag!. OK, that is great!
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Yohan Boniface notifications@github.comwrote:
Aaaah, ok, I guess you have read and misunderstood the commit message! ;)
Use unpaved for track
This means "use the same color as unpaved roads for rendering track instead of a custom one which is not contrasted enough on top of residential areas". :)
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/hotosm/HDM-CartoCSS/issues/142#issuecomment-23225784 .
http://bl.ocks.org/yohanboniface/raw/6a30c058c94f6ea3d849/#16/7.6906/18.6240 shows the borders of the landuse=residential have some tracks. It should not been tagged like this for sure, but the current rendering make the things quite blurred. A better contrast should be good