Open bgirardot opened 8 years ago
I am starting to think this is a good idea, it also goes with Cristiano's suggesting about clipping project areas, that was due to imagery.
Imagery on a per task level would reduce the number of projects that need to get created. I think creating and managing less projects to get an area mapped is a good thing. If one project with groups of task squares getting one imagery url, some other group a different imagery url and the rest get Bing that would be great.
I am not sure this is a good idea or not, but sometimes a project only needs custom imagery for a portion of the overall project. In the past I have created two TM projects to address this. It is possible that custom imagery could be assigned to just certain sections of the overall project aoi.