search

houseabsolute / DateTime-Format-Builder

Create DateTime parser classes and objects.
http://metacpan.org/release/DateTime-Format-Builder/
Other
0 stars 3 forks source link

Bad license declaration #5

Open autarch opened 4 years ago

autarch commented 4 years ago

Migrated from rt.cpan.org #125832 (status was 'new')

Requestors:

From ppisar@redhat.com on 2018-07-12 12:04:05 :

examples/W3CDTF.pm, examples/MySQL.pm, lib/DateTime/Format/Builder/Tutorial.pod files have a license declaration:

This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.

The full text of the license can be found in the LICENSE file included with this module.

That means "GPL+ or Artistic" <,https://dev.perl.org/licenses/>, but LICENSE file lists "Artistic 2.0" license. These two do not match.

Could you please clarify what license terms apply to the three files and adjust them or the the LICENSE file in accordance?

autarch commented 4 years ago

From ppisar@redhat.com on 2019-05-03 10:59:48 :

Dne Čt 12.čec.2018 08:04:05, ppisar napsal(a):

examples/W3CDTF.pm, examples/MySQL.pm, lib/DateTime/Format/Builder/Tutorial.pod files have a license declaration:

This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.

The full text of the license can be found in the LICENSE file included with this module.

That means "GPL+ or Artistic" <,https://dev.perl.org/licenses/>, but LICENSE file lists "Artistic 2.0" license. These two do not match.

Could you please clarify what license terms apply to the three files and adjust them or the the LICENSE file in accordance?

I can see lib/DateTime/Format/Builder/Tutorial.pod was changed to Artistic 2.0. But examples/W3CDTF.pm and examples/MySQL.pm are still "under the same terms as Perl itself".