I happened to have stumbled on this on a system with Moose Version 1.15 (same version set in Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint). Not sure the approach to fix or even verify what I'm looking at.
The rest is inlined below from the MYMETA.yaml block dump.
The tests that failed...
t/moose.t ................ 1/?
# Failed test 'type can be inlined'
# at t/moose.t line 18.
# Caught exception in subtest: Unknown type object Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint at t/moose.t line 91
# Failed test 'type cannot be inlined'
# at t/moose.t line 26.
# Caught exception in subtest: Unknown type object Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint at t/moose.t line 91
# Failed test 'type can be inlined but coercion cannot'
# at t/moose.t line 36.
# Caught exception in subtest: Unknown type object Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint::Parameterizable at t/moose.t line 114
# Failed test 'neither type not coercion can be inlined'
# at t/moose.t line 46.
# Caught exception in subtest: Unknown type object Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint::Parameterizable at t/moose.t line 114
# Failed test 'enum type'
# at t/moose.t line 64.
# Caught exception in subtest: Unknown type object Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint::Enum at t/moose.t line 53
# Failed test 'empty enum subtype'
# at t/moose.t line 84.
# Caught exception in subtest: Unknown type object Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint at t/moose.t line 73
# Seeded srand with seed '20220628' from local date.
t/moose.t ................ Dubious, test returned 6 (wstat 1536, 0x600)
Failed 6/6 subtests
No mention of Moose namespace in the rest of the relevant VERSIONS...
# Versions for all modules listed in MYMETA.json (including optional ones):
#
# === Configure Requires ===
#
# Module Want Have
# ------------------- ---- ----
# ExtUtils::MakeMaker any 7.64
#
# === Build Requires ===
#
# Module Want Have
# ------------------- ---- ----
# ExtUtils::MakeMaker any 7.64
#
# === Test Requires ===
#
# Module Want Have
# ------------------------- -------- --------
# ExtUtils::MakeMaker any 7.64
# File::Spec any 3.75
# Hash::Util any 0.07
# Specio 0.14 0.48
# Test2::Plugin::NoWarnings any 0.09
# Test2::Require::Module any 0.000145
# Test2::V0 any 0.000145
# Test::More 1.302015 1.302190
# Test::Without::Module any 0.20
#
# === Test Recommends ===
#
# Module Want Have
# ---------- -------- --------
# CPAN::Meta 2.120900 2.143240
#
# === Runtime Requires ===
#
# Module Want Have
# ---------------- ---- ----
# B any 1.22
# Carp any 1.11
# Eval::Closure any 0.08
# Exception::Class any 1.29
# Exporter any 5.74
# List::Util 1.29 1.62
# Scalar::Util any 1.62
# overload any 1.07
# strict any 1.04
# warnings any 1.06
#
# === Runtime Recommends ===
#
# Module Want Have
# ----------------- ---- -------
# Class::XSAccessor any missing
# Sub::Util 1.40 1.62
#
The final thing I did was add a Data::Dumper->dump to _test_int_type in moose.t, just to show what this is actually choking on...
If there's anything else I can add to help categorize this issue and tell me the best way forward on helping to get it fixed (even if it's just a documentation fix), please do let me know. I will fully accept any form of "if you'd have read X" as I'm well aware I can get tunnel vision at times like this.
I think the fix is simply to make the test require a newer version of Moose. I'll push a change to require 2.0000+ in that test. Thanks for the report!
Hi Dave,
Maybe this is something weird on my system, but it seems likely to be Moose version related.
VERSIONS: perl-5.010001 (5.10.1) Params-Validation-Compiler 0.30
I happened to have stumbled on this on a system with Moose Version 1.15 (same version set in Moose::Meta::TypeConstraint). Not sure the approach to fix or even verify what I'm looking at.
The rest is inlined below from the MYMETA.yaml block dump.
The tests that failed...
No mention of Moose namespace in the rest of the relevant VERSIONS...
The final thing I did was add a Data::Dumper->dump to
_test_int_type
in moose.t, just to show what this is actually choking on...If there's anything else I can add to help categorize this issue and tell me the best way forward on helping to get it fixed (even if it's just a documentation fix), please do let me know. I will fully accept any form of "if you'd have read X" as I'm well aware I can get tunnel vision at times like this.
Thank you, Gary Allen Vollink