Thank you for this lovely tool. Just spotted this behaviour that does not seem to be desired.
Here's my situation, a Linux server with two mounts: / and /var/www/virtualmin:
When I use vmtouch against /, it indicates total pages ~ 16G which aligns with filesystem usage on the / mount - so looks like vmtouch skips the mount in /var/www/virtualmin:
But when I execute it against all files in / (skipping some), it indicates total pages as 39GB which more or less aligns with total filesystem usage on both / and /var/www/virtualmin, so in this variant it includes the mount:
Hello!
Thank you for this lovely tool. Just spotted this behaviour that does not seem to be desired. Here's my situation, a Linux server with two mounts:
/
and/var/www/virtualmin
:When I use
vmtouch
against/
, it indicates total pages ~ 16G which aligns with filesystem usage on the/
mount - so looks likevmtouch
skips the mount in/var/www/virtualmin
:But when I execute it against all files in
/
(skipping some), it indicates total pages as 39GB which more or less aligns with total filesystem usage on both/
and/var/www/virtualmin
, so in this variant it includes the mount:Is this expected? My linux version:
5.4.0-1103-aws
.