Closed tskisner closed 1 year ago
In order to test these changes, I did the simple exercise of creating a focalplane:
toast_fake_focalplane --min_pix 7 --fov_deg 5
And then created a schedule:
toast_ground_schedule \
--site-name "Atacama" \
--telescope "LAT" \
--site-lon "-67.8" \
--site-lat "-23.0" \
--site-alt 5200 \
--patch "small_patch,1,40,-40,44,-44" \
--start "2020-01-01 00:00:00" \
--stop "2020-01-01 06:00:00" \
--out schedule.txt
And then tested the workflow with all defaults:
toast_sim_ground.py \
--focalplane focalplane.h5 \
--schedule schedule.txt
I then also tested using the WCS pixelization with all defaults:
toast_sim_ground.py \
--focalplane focalplane.h5 \
--schedule schedule.txt \
--pixels_healpix_radec.disable \
--pixels_wcs_radec.enable
Add 3 possible pixelization schemes to the workflow, with a helper function to select between them.
Cleanup a few places where the pixel distribution was created.