If you try to build the proposed image using docker/Dockerfile with the following commands:
cd docker
docker build -t energon .
The following error is raised:
=> [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile 0.0s
=> => transferring dockerfile: 378B 0.0s
=> [internal] load .dockerignore 0.0s
=> => transferring context: 2B 0.0s
=> ERROR [internal] load metadata for docker.io/hpcaitech/colossalai:0.1.8 1.7s
=> [auth] hpcaitech/colossalai:pull token for registry-1.docker.io 0.0s
------
> [internal] load metadata for docker.io/hpcaitech/colossalai:0.1.8:
------
failed to solve with frontend dockerfile.v0: failed to create LLB definition: docker.io/hpcaitech/colossalai:0.1.8: not found
It is not able to find the image with version hpcaitech/colossalai:0.1.8, which I believe it must have been deprecated. I also tried to find this image in docker hub however it doesn't seem to exist anymore.
Question: should this Dockerfile be deprecated or updated?
Additional comments
Based on the README.md, to use docker we need to run docker pull hpcaitech/energon-ai:latest which refers to energon-ai tag, however the Dockerfile mentioned above uses the parent images from colossalai. I was just wondering if this is right or was a mistake?
What is this issue about?
If you try to build the proposed image using
docker/Dockerfile
with the following commands:The following error is raised:
It is not able to find the image with version
hpcaitech/colossalai:0.1.8
, which I believe it must have been deprecated. I also tried to find this image in docker hub however it doesn't seem to exist anymore.Question: should this Dockerfile be deprecated or updated?
Additional comments
Based on the
README.md
, to use docker we need to rundocker pull hpcaitech/energon-ai:latest
which refers toenergon-ai
tag, however the Dockerfile mentioned above uses the parent images fromcolossalai
. I was just wondering if this is right or was a mistake?Thank you!