Although the conversion efficiencies are within a small range (98.6 -99.3% in M. capitata and 98.3 -99.1% in P. acuta), I did in fact detect a difference in conversion efficiency calculated by lambda alignments across methods which is plotted in panel A
Using the conversion efficiencies calculated by this code I ran ANOVAs as follows:
Here is the summary of ANVOA results: https://github.com/hputnam/Meth_Compare/blob/master/OLD_Output/conversion_efficiency_stats.csv
Although the conversion efficiencies are within a small range (98.6 -99.3% in M. capitata and 98.3 -99.1% in P. acuta), I did in fact detect a difference in conversion efficiency calculated by lambda alignments across methods which is plotted in panel A
Does this make sense @hputnam ?