Closed xingp-ng closed 2 years ago
I didn't change it. In fact, the current method does not work well on a dataset like Cifar10. As we use the pre-trained model on ImageNet, the adaptability of the model is a drawback. Our model is assumed to work well on natural images similar to ImageNet. To make the model more adaptive, you can use method like CutPaste[1] or DREAM[2] to re-train the pre-trained model and you can also modify the architecture.
[1]Li, Chun-Liang, et al. "Cutpaste: Self-supervised learning for anomaly detection and localization." Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2021. [2]Zavrtanik, Vitjan, Matej Kristan, and Danijel Skočaj. "DRAEM-A discriminatively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detection." Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 2021.
Regarding the CIFAR and MNIST datasets if they are 3232 in size, the 77 convolution in ResNet should not apply, did the authors make a change?