SRS 43 — "arc2warc" shall have make a default operation in cases where an ARC-record has no corresponding field in the WARC-record.

[GoogleCodeExporter]

SRS 43 — "arc2warc" shall have make a default operation in cases where an
ARC-record has no corresponding field in the WARC-record.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by gordon.p...@gmail.com on 27 Jul 2008 at 10:12

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Younes -- my understanding is that this is an invalid requirement because every
ARC-record has a corresponding field in the WARC record. However, I am not sure 
-- is
it possible to declare arbitrary record types in ARC? I guess it is, in the 
sense
that ARC doe snot have a real spec. Your feedback appreciated -- could you 
follow up
then reassign this issue to me. Thanks.

Original comment by gordon.p...@gmail.com on 23 Oct 2008 at 8:41

• Changed state: Started

[GoogleCodeExporter]

You can declare an arbitrary field type ("future-type") for both arc AND warc.

So it could be invalid on the grounds that you could just copy it over, but this
doesn't make much sense.   So I think this is a valid requirement.

Younes -- has this requirement been implemented?

Original comment by gordon.p...@gmail.com on 24 Apr 2009 at 1:02