This PR makes a bunch of tweaks to how commentary entries' headings are styled! In summary:
The actual line for a commentary entry is now solid rather than dotted, and --dim-color rather than --primary-color. It more or less has about the same apparent "boldness", but is harder to confuse with the dotted underline we use for hover/interactibility cues in general—used for capture/access dates. (#527)
The main text of a heading is hanging-indented! This means all but the first line are aligned a little deeper. This helps legibility a little for particularly long commentary lines.
The commentary date is now bottom-aligned (so it's always right on top of the heading line), and as far as word-wrap for main text is concerned, it occupies the entire horizontal column it's placed in.
The commentary date gets a friggin' shadow—when it's interactive! (Due to a capture/access date.) This serves as a secondary cue, and helps the dotted underline pop out from the header line. Totally static dates don't get this effect.
The commentary date doesn't do its little left-border effect when hovered. Since it gets its own column, it's less likely to accidentally look like "part of" the main heading text. And we use a change when hovered as a different cue (to indicate that a tooltip will appear soon), so better not to mix those up.
Also like, a margin fix. Commentary dates once again get the margin they're supposed to.
This PR makes a bunch of tweaks to how commentary entries' headings are styled! In summary:
--dim-color
rather than--primary-color
. It more or less has about the same apparent "boldness", but is harder to confuse with the dotted underline we use for hover/interactibility cues in general—used for capture/access dates. (#527)