Remove the This feels right and proper to me. text (first person pronoun and commentary seemed out of place compared to the rest of the docs)
Change the provided in the box to provided out of the box to make it consistent (there were 2 places using in the box and 1 using out of the box, and I think the latter is the more common idiom)
Add std::expected to the list of supported types
Remove the references to dynamically typed, because in the list of any, variant and optional (with expected added as per above) I think arguably only any would be considered dynamic, since variant, optional and expected are closed sets of N or 2 types.
This feels right and proper to me.
text (first person pronoun and commentary seemed out of place compared to the rest of the docs)provided in the box
toprovided out of the box
to make it consistent (there were 2 places usingin the box
and 1 usingout of the box
, and I think the latter is the more common idiom)std::expected
to the list of supported typesdynamically typed
, because in the list ofany
,variant
andoptional
(withexpected
added as per above) I think arguably onlyany
would be considered dynamic, sincevariant
,optional
andexpected
are closed sets of N or 2 types.