<!-- [rfced] Section 4.2. Table 2 does not capture all the information
that the "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Schemes" registry
contains, i.e., Status and Well-Known URI Support (which was
added to the registry with RFC 8615). Since the IANA
Considerations section 18.1, URI Scheme Registration, points to
Table 2, perhaps Table 2 could be replaced with a definition list
that captures all registry information? Or should the definition
list instead be added to Section 18.1?
Original:
+============+====================================+=======+
| URI Scheme | Description | Ref. |
+============+====================================+=======+
| http | Hypertext Transfer Protocol | 4.2.1 |
+- - - - - - +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +- - - -+
| https | Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure | 4.2.2 |
+- - - - - - +- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +- - - -+
Perhaps:
URI Scheme: http
Description: Hypertext Transfer Protocol
Status: Permanent
Well-Known URI Support: [RFC8615]
Reference: Section 4.2.1
URI Scheme: https
Description: Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure
Status: Permanent
Well-Known URI Support: [RFC8615]
Reference: Section 4.2.2
-->