issues
search
httpwg
/
http-core
Core HTTP Specifications
https://httpwg.org/http-core/
470
stars
43
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Note that response metadata can influence content semantics (#914)
#925
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
RFC 5322 is not cited normatively, yet used in the ABNF
#924
reschke
closed
3 years ago
2
removal of obs-fold from field-value causes inconsistencies
#923
reschke
closed
3 years ago
1
tune prose in text that references [HTTP] for status code information (#915)
#922
reschke
closed
3 years ago
1
s/larger number of multiple connections/larger numbers of connections/ (#915)
#921
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
For 'Accept-Encoding', clarify that these are examples, not a single multi-line one (#914)
#920
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
In 'Trailer', consistently use the term 'signature' (#914)
#919
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
te: add forward reference to 'weight' (#914)
#918
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
ETag is not a request field (#914)
#917
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
Roman's COMMENT on Messaging
#916
mnot
closed
3 years ago
1
Ben Kakuk's COMMENT on Messaging
#915
mnot
closed
3 years ago
3
Ben Kaduk's COMMENT on semantics
#914
mnot
closed
3 years ago
3
Ben Kaduk's COMMENT on caching
#913
mnot
closed
3 years ago
6
editorial/trivial/cache: missing "it" in security considerations
#912
wtarreau
closed
3 years ago
0
Cache lists HTTP/1.1 as a normative reference when it could be informative
#911
royfielding
closed
3 years ago
2
change log for #902
#910
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
add change note for #905
#909
reschke
closed
3 years ago
1
Ben Kaduk's DISCUSS on Semantics - notify the user in certificate validation
#908
royfielding
closed
3 years ago
0
switch to named references instead of RFC numbers (for HTTP family)
#907
royfielding
closed
3 years ago
3
without changing the protocol, be explicit about when non-standard content in requests …
#906
royfielding
closed
3 years ago
0
require recipients to avoid smuggling/splitting attacks when processing …
#905
royfielding
closed
3 years ago
1
Content on GET: requirement strength
#904
mnot
closed
3 years ago
25
address remaining Roman Danyliw editorial comments
#903
royfielding
closed
3 years ago
0
clarify that Accept-Ranges can be sent by any server
#902
royfielding
closed
3 years ago
4
(editorial) remove bit about accepting absolute-form for potential transition
#901
royfielding
closed
3 years ago
0
(editorial) tweaks inspired by kaduk suggestions from IESG review
#900
royfielding
closed
3 years ago
0
forked suggestions by kaduk with further edits
#899
royfielding
closed
3 years ago
0
Check target URIs for scheme semantic mismatches
#898
mnot
closed
3 years ago
1
Only use absolute-form if it's a proxy
#897
mnot
closed
3 years ago
2
Ben Kaduk's DISCUSS on Semantics - absolute URIs as request targets
#896
mnot
closed
3 years ago
3
Mid-stream error semantics?
#895
tigt
closed
3 years ago
3
WWW-Authenticate is a response header field (closes #893)
#894
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
WWW-Authenticate - clarify that it's a response header field
#893
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
Clarify that only selectable responses are updated
#892
mnot
closed
3 years ago
0
Feedback from Lars
#891
mnot
closed
3 years ago
0
Align field name requirements
#890
mnot
closed
3 years ago
0
reference "Terminology" + minor cleanups (#869)
#889
reschke
closed
3 years ago
4
Changes: note deprecation of Accept-Charset (closes #886)
#888
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
Clarify that both accept-params and accept-ext are gone (closes #885)
#887
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
mention deprecation of Accept-Charset in Changes section
#886
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
note about removal of accept-ext should mention accept-params as well
#885
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
TCP -> underlying transport
#884
mnot
closed
3 years ago
0
Reinstate 'to a request' in 206
#883
mnot
closed
3 years ago
0
Accept-Ranges is for Origin Servers
#882
mnot
closed
3 years ago
12
remove "TCP"
#881
mnot
closed
3 years ago
0
Explain the "Content-" prefix
#880
mnot
closed
3 years ago
0
Should servers interpret Transfer-Encoding in 1.0 requests?
#879
mattiasgrenfeldt
closed
3 years ago
28
Content and Payload
#878
mnot
closed
3 years ago
3
Robert Wilton COMMENT draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-16
#877
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
Erik Kline COMMENT draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-16
#876
reschke
closed
3 years ago
0
Previous
Next