augment security considerations with pointers to current research

[mnot]

Stephen Farrell

Discuss (2013-12-19)

There was originally supposed to be a separate deliverable to describe the security properties of HTTP, but that's not happening. I think its fair to say that the security considerations here (or across the entire set) don't really do all of that as well. I think that does leave a gap. However, I'm not sure what to do about that, since I don't believe there's any real chance of getting anyone to address this gap - its been tried and apparently failed, and with lots of security work in HTTP/2.0, its extremely unlikely that a victim will be found for this un-fun task.

That said, I do think it'd be worthwhile if the authors made an attempt to fill that gap by spending some cycles on finding a good set of references to HTTP security topics and adding those to the security considerations sections of p1 and/or p2.

Now, I'm sure that the authors won't want to do that (who ever wants to do a state-of-the-art study? even a tiny one like this) so the point I want to DISCUSS with the IESG initially and then with the chair and authors is whether or not that's a reasonable ask. (So, authors, no need to chime in just yet.)

Reported by julian.reschke@gmx.de, migrated from https://trac.ietf.org/trac/httpbis/ticket/549

[mnot]

julian.reschke@gmx.de changed summary from augment security considerations to augment security considerations with pointers to current research

[mnot]

• julian.reschke@gmx.de changed attachment to 549.diff
• julian.reschke@gmx.de commented:

Proposed patch for p1

[mnot]

julian.reschke@gmx.de commented:

From 2547:

augment security considerations with pointers to current research (see #549)

[mnot]

• julian.reschke@gmx.de changed resolution to incorporated
• julian.reschke@gmx.de changed status from new to closed

[mnot]

fielding@gbiv.com commented:

From 2565:

(editorial) Add security section on injection attacks; reference the OWASP Guide instead of the wiki; see #520 and #549

[mnot]

fielding@gbiv.com commented:

From 2567:

(editorial) Use more specific headers in security section for clarity and put related sections next to each other; see #520 and #549

[mnot]

fielding@gbiv.com commented:

From 2568:

(editorial) update security section intro for p7; see #520 and #549

[mnot]

fielding@gbiv.com commented:

From 2569:

(editorial) OWASP only provides useful additional info for web application semantics and authentication; see #520 and #549

[mnot]

fielding@gbiv.com commented:

From 2609:

Augment security considerations with pointers to current research and explanation of the considerations specific to HTTP message parsing and routing; see #531 and #549

[mnot]

fielding@gbiv.com commented:

From 2612:

(editorial) minor tweaks to new security sections (suggested by mnot); see #549