Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Original comment by jsakuda
on 20 Aug 2008 at 6:03
Same issue here.. My team would like to put in 5 votes for this feature request!
Gary Cristofoli
Lead Software Engineer
Technology Infrastructure - Enterprise Solutions
GE Security, Inc.
Original comment by gary.cri...@gmail.com
on 28 May 2009 at 3:11
Hello,
I give another 5 votes for that feature! :-)
Frank Bernhardt
Robert Bosch GmbH
G2/PJ-PMT2
Postfach 30 02 20
70442 Stuttgart
GERMANY
www.bosch.com
Original comment by bee0...@googlemail.com
on 9 Sep 2009 at 1:50
This will be very much useful.
Original comment by vboor...@gmail.com
on 24 Dec 2009 at 5:47
I vote this as our number one enhancement request. Our team also works out of
multiple eclipse projects for our product. It is rare that our reviews do not
span
accross at leat two projects. for now we have to rely on naming the reviews the
same
so we can mine the data for metrics.
Original comment by howsley63@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2010 at 12:07
For OSGI based projects, which naturally consist of multiple eclipse-projects,
this is a very essential feature.
Original comment by ronald.b...@gmail.com
on 21 Jul 2010 at 12:52
Hello,
My team wanted to use the Jupiter for code review purpose. I got the plug-in
from your site. But you were saying that it is not completed fully and also it
is in experimental stage now. I want to know that whether you are still working
on it or you were migrating to some other plug-in for this functionality. If
you are working on it fully, when can I expect the complete version of the
Jupiter. Because we are planning to use it for long time purpose so that before
use this, we need all clarifications.
We are expecting your earliest reply.
Thanks for your support,
Original comment by jamuna.s...@gmail.com
on 27 Jul 2010 at 9:13
I must agree with others. For me, it is a must have feature to be able to
perform review on multiple projects, but I see that there is no work going
around this area. Am I mistaken?
Original comment by adam.now...@gmail.com
on 24 Aug 2010 at 9:10
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
noty...@gmail.com
on 20 Aug 2008 at 11:00