Closed Fxmangd closed 8 months ago
Thank you for your interest!
The previous image here refers to the previous frame in the temporal sequence. And the reason for this choice is just as you pointed out that there is little overlap of FOV between spatially adjacent images. However, other work for depth estimation like SurroundDepth takes this spatial correlation into consideration explicitly. For us, we treat this problem similar to monocular depth estimation.
Thank you very much for your reply.
I have a small question about another area. You presented the ablation experimental results under different temporal supervision settings in your paper, as shown below:
May I ask if the result shown in the first line, where both prev and next are set to 0, is the result without using temporal supervision, or in other words, is this result obtained without L_dep?
Not exactly. We use L_dep to supervise the depth of the current frame in the first line.
In the other lines, nonzero values under Prev. and Next mean that we also supervise the depth of temporal frames.
Thank you very much for your patient answer. My question has been completely resolved.
May I ask if you could reveal more about the evaluation criteria for depth estimation, as occupancy can only cover a range of 80m in BEV, but the depth generated by projection of LiDAR points may exceed this range? Did you use a mask when evaluating depth?
Absolutely. We use TPV to represent an area of [-51.2, -51.2, -4.0, 51.2, 51.2, 5.0] around the ego car for nuScenes. However, we still follow the conventional evaluation protocol for depth estimation which evaluates depth in the range of [-80, 80].
Btw, we are going to release the evaluation code soon.
Thank you very much for your answer once again, and looking forward to your upcoming code release
Dear authors,
First, please let me thank you for your great work. I saw in your paper that only the current frame was used for depth estimation and you activate L_dep for depth estimation, as mentioned below:
As stated in the paper, L_dep is formulated by taking the minimum of two L_mvss using the previous image I_t−1 or the next image I_t+1 as the source image, may I ask if the previous image here refers to the previous image in the temporal sequence, or is it the previous perspective in the panoramic view? As far as I know, there is a relatively small overlap in the panoramic perspective in nuscenes, so I have some doubts about this.
Thank you very much in advance.