Open andreasbueckle opened 1 year ago
@andreasbueckle @bherr2 as per today's digital object stand-up meeting; I had piloted Griffin's idea of using ASCT+B format to essentially capture the exisiting body systems --> anatomical system UBERON:0000467 and the partonomy already existing in uberon.
Caveats which I've discussed every time this comes up with regards to body systems is that some organs like pancreas fit into multiple systems due to their functions.
To fully explore how our organs fit and exist in current uberon ontology, I will complete this body-systems-DRAFTv1.0 "ASCT+B" table: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1oB3m_IOMEcDsdQoDicXd9KXXz7oytIPIPiu9lq88quU/edit#gid=2028977062
Sounds good! Glad this is getting traction and I hope we are getting a consensus. Our use case for this field is to
It is OK for us if an organ is associated with multiple body systems.
@bherr2 It would be useful to get a
body_system
field to the CCF API response, e.g., for the/scene
and/reference-organs
routes, that we do not need to manually update the body_systems_list CSV in https://github.com/cns-iu/ccf-organ-vr-gallery/blob/main/CCF3DOrganGallery/Assets/Resources/Body_Systems_List.csv at every HRA release.