Closed dosumis closed 5 months ago
There are no CL terms in AS slots:
@anitacaron can correct me if I'm wrong, but since in the eye table CT1 slots are very general (neuron, epithelial cell, ...), they don't validate with the last AS slot, but CT2 does (and with CT1). That's why it has these two relationships.
@dosumis The rdfs:subClassOf
label is not between microglial cell and neuron, but another arrow passing by.
The ccf_part_of
and ccf_located_in
are default relationships to show not valid ones and only added in the graph, not in the CCF_CT_AS.owl.
Does this reflect oddities in the ASCT+B table?
CL terms in AS slots and Uberon terms in CT slots. If so, shouldn't some basic validation of sheet catch this?