This PR uses values_included the right way... but since there was only that one test that needed to be changed, I feel like our test coverage here is insufficient, but I'm also not sure what kind of values make sense to give for that parameter.
Maybe merge this as is? Or if you want to expand the tests, feel free to commit to this branch.
This PR uses
values_included
the right way... but since there was only that one test that needed to be changed, I feel like our test coverage here is insufficient, but I'm also not sure what kind of values make sense to give for that parameter.Maybe merge this as is? Or if you want to expand the tests, feel free to commit to this branch.