search

hubverse-org / hubEnsemblesManuscript

https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/Infectious-Disease-Modeling-Hubs/hubEnsemblesManuscript/blob/master/analysis/paper/hubEnsembles_manuscript.html
Other
1 stars 2 forks source link

Boldface in Table 10 #32

Closed lshandross closed 5 months ago

lshandross commented 5 months ago

Original comment from @nickreich in #23:

Table 5.1 caption: suggest adding statement of how bolded numbers were chosen, as well as a statement about when lower is better, etc... Also, given that the differences are quite small and that the median-ensemble is not really a clear "best" model when looking at the figures below, maybe it's not worth boldfacing those numbers at all? As it really looks like we're "crowning a winner" (kind of unintentionally - the text is more ambivalent, but the boldface feels like a stamp of approval somehow) when the evidence for that feels fairly weak to me.

The boldface has been left for now, with the description edited, since it was a feature requested in Issue #1 but further discussion is welcome on whether to keep the boldface or not

nickreich commented 5 months ago

I'm ok with the boldface. I note that one of the numbers appears to be italicized - maybe that should be removed? this is in the median-ensemble row, cov50 column.