Closed vladmandic closed 6 days ago
thanks @vladmandic we are looking into this now!
@vladmandic will this work as a temporary resolution? will update once we decide what to do with this
@vladmandic will this work as a temporary resolution? will update once we decide how to host them
yes, it should, although its probably better to have it hosted under hf account and not reference a random 3rd party model.
@vladmandic should I wait to merge then? yes we are looking into that, and if this is not urgent for you I'd rather to wait util that decision is made
@yiyixuxu can you also fix this example? https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/tree/main/examples/controlnet
thank you.
for most of cases, sdnext already uses offline config files, this issue pops up in some border cases - i'd say its important, but can wait a proper solution for a day.
@vladmandic @dave-gray101. I merged #https://github.com/huggingface/diffusers/pull/9323 so single file support should be back on now
thanks - that'[s now on main - what about doing a service pack release? this is serious enough for that.
@vladmandic yes!
I'd really encourage huggingface to either take some decisive action and replace that repo that automatically points to a well maintained fork OR reinstate it completely. this is causing too many transient errors with everything that depends on it.
This was just a quick fix for the moment, also the model we linked as a patch is the most used one for SD 1.5 and I believe if the author, which is a well known person takes it down, the backslash for doing it will be a lot more than the base one, so I don't think we need to worry about that until we provide a better fix soon.
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If you think this still needs to be addressed please comment on this thread.
Please note that issues that do not follow the contributing guidelines are likely to be ignored.
partially resolved but we still need to update everywhere in our doc with https://huggingface.co/stable-diffusion-v1-5 let me know if anyone is interested!
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. If you think this still needs to be addressed please comment on this thread.
Please note that issues that do not follow the contributing guidelines are likely to be ignored.
I think this was resolved?
Describe the bug
RunwayML just removed their entire code from huggingface!
See note at https://huggingface.co/runwayml: "We are no longer maintaining a HuggingFace organization"
Which causes pretty big issues since
runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5
is referenced as default/fallback in many places in the code. for example,loaders/single_file_utils.py
hasReproduction
N/A
Logs
System Info
N/A
Who can help?
@yiyixuxu @sayakpaul @DN6 @asomoza