Breaking changes in v0.19.1 for tiktoken/llama3

[sanderland]

import tokenizers
def show_tokenization(tok, s):
    ids = tok.encode(s, add_special_tokens=False).ids
    print([(i, tok.decode([i])) for i in ids])

def show_tokenization_from_id(tok, id):
    s = tok.decode([id])
    print(f"id {id} decodes to {s!r}, which encodes to...")
    show_tokenization(tok, s)

fb_tok = tokenizers.Tokenizer.from_pretrained("meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B")
show_tokenization_from_id(112328)

v0.19.0 id 112328 decodes to ' Arthropoda', which encodes to... [(1676, ' Ar'), (98643, 'throp'), (14320, 'oda')]

v0.19.1 id 112328 decodes to ' Arthropoda', which encodes to... [(112328, ' Arthropoda')]

I have good evidence that the new behaviour is how the model was trained, but the announcement of the patch release should perhaps be a little louder in advising to e.g. retokenize all training data for particular model families.

[thusinh1969]

I am waiting for #1513 break changes to happend to start continual pretrain LlaMA-3 with extended vocab et all.

Not sure when this merge will happend (v0.19.2 I guess) as it is critical for LLaMA-3 for non-English corpus.

Cheers, Steve

[sanderland]

@thusinh1969 What are you finding wrong with 0.19.1?

[thusinh1969]

@thusinh1969 What are you finding wrong with 0.19.1?

The decoder was buggy for added token when we want to extend vocab for non-English. Being fixed I think.

https://github.com/meta-llama/llama3/issues/67

Steve

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

[ArthurZucker]

Yep the breaking change will be reverted, but we will still ship the new addition of tokens for BPE. Just gimme a week!

[ArthurZucker]

1555