There are some interesting ideas in GENet, nice job!
After reading your paper, I notice that the reported accuracy of SENet and Baseline model (i.e., original ResNets) are quite different from SENet paper (~1.% higher). But there is no data augmentation reported in your experiments. Did I miss something?
Without data augmentation, could GENet still outperform ResNets that much? (only use random crop+flip and 90 epochs). THX.
There are some interesting ideas in GENet, nice job! After reading your paper, I notice that the reported accuracy of SENet and Baseline model (i.e., original ResNets) are quite different from SENet paper (~1.% higher). But there is no data augmentation reported in your experiments. Did I miss something? Without data augmentation, could GENet still outperform ResNets that much? (only use random crop+flip and 90 epochs). THX.