Open loopRW opened 8 years ago
I agree with POI based destinations. I'm worrying about backward compatibility with this function. If we choose this we should not keep previous way, otherwise code will be confusing I guess
I agree that we should not keep both. Are there any concerns for backwards compatibility? The current maps can be ported by placing a destination POI on what are currently destination nodes. That way we can upgrade all the environments we have.
Destinations as nodes are problematic when too many destinations are on a same logical edge. Should we start changing to POI based destinations?