Is there a discussion about the output values?
The PNAS publication suggests that some of these are measures of how well the sample fits
alternate references alleles.
--- the output has the following items:
rank, solution, competitor, missing, core, noncore, my.total, comp.total.
my.alone, comp.alone, my.core, comp.core, my.core.sp, comp.core.sp, my.noncore.
comp.noncore, my.noncore.sp, comp.noncore.sp, heter.reads, importance, ambig.
field1, field2.
Perhaps a link to such a discussion could be placed on github.
Thank you again for your strong work !.
Dan
Thank you very much for creating xHLA !
Is there a discussion about the output values? The PNAS publication suggests that some of these are measures of how well the sample fits alternate references alleles. --- the output has the following items: rank, solution, competitor, missing, core, noncore, my.total, comp.total. my.alone, comp.alone, my.core, comp.core, my.core.sp, comp.core.sp, my.noncore. comp.noncore, my.noncore.sp, comp.noncore.sp, heter.reads, importance, ambig. field1, field2.
Perhaps a link to such a discussion could be placed on github. Thank you again for your strong work !. Dan