It has been mildly bothering me that the base of the "y" is pointing to the 'wrong' direction.
That way it also could be closer to the most characteristic operator of haskell >>=. (as opposed to =<<)
Made a very quick and rough sketch:
How would this change sound to you?
Edit: Oh, and in case you are concerned that you'd still like to retain the resemblance to a lambda, would it help to think of this change as instead of a 180 degree rotation, the lambda is flipped upside down?
It has been mildly bothering me that the base of the "y" is pointing to the 'wrong' direction.
That way it also could be closer to the most characteristic operator of haskell
>>=. (as opposed to=<<)Made a very quick and rough sketch:
How would this change sound to you?
Edit: Oh, and in case you are concerned that you'd still like to retain the resemblance to a lambda, would it help to think of this change as instead of a 180 degree rotation, the lambda is flipped upside down?