hunthu2000 / engile

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/engile
0 stars 0 forks source link

Planner component corrections #17

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
The planner milestone tree should be expanded to atleast one level by 
default. 

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dpa...@hotmail.com on 21 Dec 2009 at 6:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Add Milestone button creates a new milestone form. 

The fields in milestone entity are not correct. 

In this form there is a suggestion box to select a parent project. Its wrong. 
We should not be able to select / change the project. the project should be 
current project by default and should be 
fixed. 

Scheduled should be a boolean field and needs more elaboration on why it is 
needed. 

Original comment by dpa...@hotmail.com on 21 Dec 2009 at 6:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Add Iteration expects us to select a milestone through a milestone suggestion 
box. 

1. The Milestone should be selected by default if the user has selected the 
milestone 
on left side

2. If not it should default to current scheduled milestone if any

3. The user can use the suggestion box other wise to select a milestone for 
which the 
Iteration is being added.

4. Iteration number should be automated and sequential in nature. 

5. Scheduled should be boolean. When this flag is checked we should validate if 
this 
iteration dates are overlapping with any other iteration dates. 

6. PRCE / PRCV / PRCS are useless fields and should be thrown out. 

Original comment by dpa...@hotmail.com on 21 Dec 2009 at 6:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Clicking on Add Iteration operation is more operations box of milestone should 
allow 
us to add an iteration to the specified milestone. 

Original comment by dpa...@hotmail.com on 21 Dec 2009 at 6:57

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Details for the planner and milestone / iteration entity changes.

Original comment by dpa...@hotmail.com on 24 Dec 2009 at 10:28