Closed samsara-ku closed 2 years ago
Hi, @samsara-ku. Thanks for your interest in our work. For the first question, this is absolutely a mistake in our core rearrangement. Thanks for Thanks for pointing this out and I will update the correct code now. For the second question, the semantic loss is introduced by CondInst and I suggest you to follow the config here.
Hi, I'm wondering the meaning of codes in this figure. These codes are in the python file
adet/modeling/condinst/crossvis.py
.When I actually run your training code, there is no update with
sem_losses_0
,proposal_losses_0
andmask_losses_0
due to updating withlosses
dict, not thelosses_0
.So based on this situation, I want to ask you two questions:
1) Did you intend this kind of logic, updating with only one frame? 2) Although I didn't see all iteration of training, based on some iteration,
sem_losses
was empty dict. Is it correct?