Closed imyyf closed 1 year ago
All models are evaluated under the same evaluation data. Though there exists currupted data, we don't think it will affect the fariness of the valuation. The only incurred issue is that it will decrease the samples for evaluation, but AV2 data frequency is much higher than nuScenes (10Hz vs 2Hz). So the number of evaluated samples are enough compared to nuScenes. In conclusion, we don't think it will influence the evaluation rationality.
Thanks for your reply
https://github.com/hustvl/MapTR/blob/11307ed835dd7534ebb8927df9609f0b1b825aa6/projects/mmdet3d_plugin/datasets/av2_map_dataset.py#L1202 https://github.com/hustvl/MapTR/blob/11307ed835dd7534ebb8927df9609f0b1b825aa6/projects/mmdet3d_plugin/datasets/av2_map_dataset.py#L1203 https://github.com/hustvl/MapTR/blob/11307ed835dd7534ebb8927df9609f0b1b825aa6/projects/mmdet3d_plugin/datasets/av2_map_dataset.py#L1203 Have you met Av2 data curruption? We meet the image data is none or the lidar data is none. In our Av2 data, there are 4% val data are curruption. Does it influence the evaluation rationality?