model training poorly with default

[scharnk]

Hi, I'm having trouble recreating the same quality models, for example the first one here is using your pre_trained rain_princess.ckpt file under normal default parameters specified in this repo, while the second image is using a model I trained using default parameters (~6-8hrs). Wondering why there is so much content loss compared to yours. I've changed many parameters from default and each model gets further away from looking as nice as yours. Any suggestions?/has anyone else encountered this before?

Thanks in advance for the help! Best, Kelsey

from your model rain_princess.ckpt:

from default parameters: content_weight=7.5e0, style_weight=5e2, content_layer_weights=[1.0], style_layer_weights=[.2,.2,.2,.2,.2], num_epochs=2, batch_size=4

from parameters: content_weight=5e2, style_weight=5e2, content_layer_weights=[0.1], style_layer_weights=[.2,.2,.2,.2,.2], num_epochs=2, batch_size=4

from parameters: content_weight=5e2, style_weight=5e2, content_layer_weights=[0.4], style_layer_weights=[.2,.2,.2,.2,.2], num_epochs=2, batch_size=8

from parameters: content_weight=7.5e0, style_weight=5e2, content_layer_weights=[1.0], style_layer_weights=[.8,.8,.8,.8,.8], num_epochs=2, batch_size=8

from parameters: content_weight=7.5e0, style_weight=5e4, content_layer_weights=[1.0], style_layer_weights=[.8,.8,.8,.8,.8], num_epochs=2, batch_size=8

[jszym]

Have you found a solution to this @scharnk ? I've had similar results.

[dakshvar22]

Hi @scharnk and @jszym have you guys been able to reproduce the quality of the pre-trained models? Something seems terribly off.