Open laura-wang opened 6 years ago
i also got ~30% and i don't know what to do...
where i need to modify,i train from scratch and get a very low accuracy,maybe i modify error location,can you help me,thank you very much! i stacked here for many days.
i only set "use_pretrained_model = False" in the train_c3d_ucf101.py
i also got ~30% and i don't know what to do...
where i need to modify,i train from scratch and get a very low accuracy,maybe i modify error location,can you help me,thank you very much! i stacked here for many days.
i only set "use_pretrained_model = False" in the train_c3d_ucf101.py
Was anyone able to address this issue? It is concerning that we are unable to reproduce the same results that the GitHub presents. I have trained C3D from scratch using UCF-101 on split 1 at both 5k and 20k iterations (using the 5fps and 10 batch samples as suggested by the instructions in this GitHub). In both cases I am unable to generate an accuracy >30%.
I am able to reproduce the results of Du Tran's paper result, i.e., ~45% now. Our paper is accepted in CVPR 2019. And I will realse my code later.
Use the train_c3d_ucf101.py to train the ucf101 dataset from scratch, I can only get ~30% acc, which is much more lower than the reported ~45% accuracy.
Can anyone get higher accuracy?