Closed azaroth42 closed 8 years ago
I think the main issue here is to draw the connections between dpla:SourceResource
and ore:Aggregation
in DPLA MAP, and pcdm:Object
.
It's easy enough to say that dctype:Collection
is a equivalent class or subclass of pcdm:Collection
. An edm:WebResource
is generally going to be a pcdm:File
, or a non-repository resource. But there's a little bit of a disconnect when we come to mapping pcdm:Object
membership structures into MAP.
:+1: Whiteboarding seems like a necessary first step for progress
Issue for PCDM: is hasMember
transitive? What are the implications for collection membership?
Some decisions:
pcdm:Object
that is not hasMember
of another pcdm:Object
will be treated as a dpla:SourceResource
.Added @guegueng to consulted
Responsible: @no-reply @azaroth42 Approver: @anarchivist? Consulted: @mjgiarlo @guegueng Informed: @anarchivist
Complete when there is a public description of how DPLA MAP and PCDM can be used together.