Model Questions from Scenario 1a

[azaroth42]

@hannahfrost @ggeisler @guegueng @no-reply

• [x] Are there different relationships expected between the postcard and the "terms" (Place, Subject, Date)? For example, are they all just "tags" with no expectation of semantics, are they grouped by type but not relationship (e.g. distinguish a place from a subject that happens to also be a place), or individual relationships (written place, received place, current place)?
• [x] To what extent are physical attributes expected to be searchable (as a proxy for understanding semantic or not) versus just rendered to the user? For example, do we need to separate width, height, depth, weight, each with a value and a unit, or is there a single text box for physical notes?
• [x] If the above is notes, then there is expected to be a separate notes field for other notes or just one?

[azaroth42]

PR coming with docs for 1 & 2 -- answers being that specific relationships for people and places are important, and that search/discovery is the primary mechanism for determining level of modeling required -- people don't expect to search and compare things like height/width, so no need to model beyond a simple dc:extent text field.

For notes, the discussion resolved to include a notes field for adding extra content, where the expectation is for display rather than any level of semantic understanding. At best, a full text search option for notes ("all fields" equivalent?) would be feasible.

[azaroth42]

All questions answered and a strategy in place (re #17 #22)