Closed azaroth42 closed 7 years ago
Let me know what you mean and happy to contribute.
DPLA MAPv4 uses edm:Place
, assuming a base compatibility with geonames:Feature
(this makes it a subclass of schema:Place
). This compatibility is improved in Geonames Ontology 3.1, which removes cardinality constraints from gn:Feature
.
It may be worth looking at the status of ongoing work of the W3C Spatial Data on the Web WG.
A few questions:
Feature hierarchies are welcome in the same way as broader/narrower concepts.
What relationships are there from resources to Places? dcterms:spatial (which seems like it could just be subject, no?) schema:birthPlace / deathPlace ... we should have some sort of place of creation (bf:originPlace ?). There isn't an event model, which would be the obvious place for it.
We should add dcterms:spatial
for the sake of alignment with DPLA MAPv4.
Closing, because documentation exists.
Most useful subset of geonames? Pull in @mejackreed.